Page 2 of 4

Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 15:42
by fanaat
Komop stalhouders, zet je kudde in de turbo!!!! }:O }:O }:O

Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 20:39
by MrGreen
Ik heb inmiddels een Geforce 260GTX bijgeschakeld }:O

Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 20:58
by madman
Hmm nieuwe beta is wel wat langzamer als de vorige...

Code: Select all

dnetc v2.9102-508-GTL-08122211-*dev* for Win32

[Jan 18 18:22:30 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 18 18:22:45 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.26 [353,933,716 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:22:45 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:00 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.21 [356,213,032 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:00 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:15 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.42 [350,096,000 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:15 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:30 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.46 [347,749,507 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:30 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:15.03 [288,217,970 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:48 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Jan 18 18:24:06 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sle ...
                      0.00:00:16.07 [268,094,597 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:24:06 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Jan 18 18:24:22 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sle ...
                      0.00:00:12.96 [334,923,870 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:24:22 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Jan 18 18:28:16 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd bus ...
                      0.00:00:12.32 [350,906,275 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:28:16 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 18 18:28:31 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.00 [361,978,371 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:28:31 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 18 18:28:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:14.34 [301,471,262 keys/sec]

dnetc v2.9103-509-GTL-09010508-*dev* for Win32

[Jan 26 18:48:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 26 18:48:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.43 [349,513,551 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:48:23 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 26 18:48:38 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.34 [350,929,780 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:48:38 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd).
[Jan 26 18:48:53 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.56 [344,562,577 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:48:53 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:08 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.20 [354,213,024 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:26 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:15.15 [285,755,146 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:26 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:41 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:12.10 [358,431,728 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:41 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:58 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:14.43 [300,133,516 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:58 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Jan 26 18:50:14 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd bus ...
                      0.00:00:12.56 [346,264,877 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:50:14 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Jan 26 18:50:32 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sl ...
                      0.00:00:16.11 [268,263,147 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:50:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dyna ...
[Jan 26 18:50:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sl ...
                      0.00:00:13.00 [333,015,565 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:50:48 UTC] RC5-72 benchmark summary :
                      Default core : #-1 (undefined)
                      Fastest core : #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)

Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 16:38
by DSmarty
Helaas kan ik niet zoveel bijdragen aangezien ik alleen maar ATI videokaarten heb.

Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 18:23
by Libido78
ach..zo belangrijk is het ook niet (meer).

Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 22:01
by Prezzz
Ik wil wel weer koetje stallen (cpu en videokaart) maar moet iemand wel ff helpen met de koe goed in te stellen, vorige keer werd de pc zo traag, dat ik nie gamen nie, en nie interernette nie,...

Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 22:07
by Marshal
De videokaart koe samen met GTA IV draaien is geen succes is mijn ervaring. Maar je zit natuurlijk niet altijd te gamen :)

Gewoon met de standaard instellingen juiste emailadres invullen en gaan }:O

Posted: 07 Feb 2009, 10:01
by fanaat
Yeah, de 1 m is gepasseerd }:O }:O }:O

Posted: 10 Feb 2009, 18:16
by Libido78
mooi...nu hopen dat alles ineens binnen komt
wat doen we met de name-change?

p.s ook klein dumpje gedaan

Posted: 11 Feb 2009, 01:28
by fanaat
Libido78 wrote:mooi...nu hopen dat alles ineens binnen komt
wat doen we met de name-change?

p.s ook klein dumpje gedaan
Mag je vaker doen 8)

Posted: 11 Feb 2009, 18:30
by iisschots
TeamBVD 10 year Birthday flush!!

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 07:27
by Libido78
bijna tijd, weinig interesse.

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 08:05
by iisschots
Of iedereen vind het prima :)

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 12:18
by Marshal
Ik vind de tekst goed hoor :) Simpel en duidelijk.

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 15:09
by madman
Tekst lijkt me idd prima! Dsmarty, zet jij hem er as donderdag in bij Dnet?

Woensdagochtend zal ik de proxy openen zodat alle blocks geflusht zullen worden en we dus op 19 februari in de stats komen te staan met onze megaflush :)

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 16:46
by fanaat
Yeahhhhhhhhhhhh

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 18:06
by DSmarty
Ik knal de tekst er donderdag wel in.

Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 18:18
by Libido78
had ik nu deze week maar alvast ATV...hele dag F5-en :P

Posted: 17 Feb 2009, 19:02
by Pjosch
De kraan gaat zo meteen open....

Posted: 17 Feb 2009, 22:01
by madman
Iemand is aan het sparen geweest :)

Posted: 18 Feb 2009, 07:21
by madman
Sesam open u ^:^

Posted: 18 Feb 2009, 07:38
by Libido78
OLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEĂƒâ€°

Posted: 18 Feb 2009, 10:24
by Marshal
Ze komen eraaaaaaan }:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O}:O

Posted: 18 Feb 2009, 10:43
by fanaat
Whoow, eindelijk!!!! Ben benieuwd wat er aan komt bij Dnet.

Posted: 18 Feb 2009, 21:26
by Marshal
Nu de proxy open staat, zou dan niet het aantal "Done Blocks waiting to transmit" moeten afnemen?