Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 15:42
Komop stalhouders, zet je kudde in de turbo!!!!
Code: Select all
dnetc v2.9102-508-GTL-08122211-*dev* for Win32
[Jan 18 18:22:30 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 18 18:22:45 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd)
0.00:00:12.26 [353,933,716 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:22:45 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:00 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd)
0.00:00:12.21 [356,213,032 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:00 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:15 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd)
0.00:00:12.42 [350,096,000 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:15 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:30 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd)
0.00:00:12.46 [347,749,507 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:30 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 18 18:23:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd)
0.00:00:15.03 [288,217,970 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:23:48 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Jan 18 18:24:06 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sle ...
0.00:00:16.07 [268,094,597 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:24:06 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Jan 18 18:24:22 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sle ...
0.00:00:12.96 [334,923,870 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:24:22 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Jan 18 18:28:16 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd bus ...
0.00:00:12.32 [350,906,275 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:28:16 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 18 18:28:31 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)
0.00:00:12.00 [361,978,371 keys/sec]
[Jan 18 18:28:31 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 18 18:28:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd)
0.00:00:14.34 [301,471,262 keys/sec]
dnetc v2.9103-509-GTL-09010508-*dev* for Win32
[Jan 26 18:48:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 26 18:48:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd)
0.00:00:12.43 [349,513,551 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:48:23 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 26 18:48:38 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd)
0.00:00:12.34 [350,929,780 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:48:38 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd).
[Jan 26 18:48:53 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd)
0.00:00:12.56 [344,562,577 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:48:53 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:08 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd)
0.00:00:12.20 [354,213,024 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:26 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd)
0.00:00:15.15 [285,755,146 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:26 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:41 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)
0.00:00:12.10 [358,431,728 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:41 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd).
[Jan 26 18:49:58 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd)
0.00:00:14.43 [300,133,516 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:49:58 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Jan 26 18:50:14 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd bus ...
0.00:00:12.56 [346,264,877 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:50:14 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Jan 26 18:50:32 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sl ...
0.00:00:16.11 [268,263,147 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:50:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dyna ...
[Jan 26 18:50:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sl ...
0.00:00:13.00 [333,015,565 keys/sec]
[Jan 26 18:50:48 UTC] RC5-72 benchmark summary :
Default core : #-1 (undefined)
Fastest core : #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)
Mag je vaker doenLibido78 wrote:mooi...nu hopen dat alles ineens binnen komt
wat doen we met de name-change?
p.s ook klein dumpje gedaan